Investigative reports are produced by the OIG Investigative staff. Written reports are prepared for all investigations and presents the conclusions of fact in an accurate, fair and objective manner. Reports may include findings and recommendations which encourage fairness and accountability; however, the OIG does not have the authority to order or direct changes in City policies, procedures, or activities. Reports issued by the OIG may require City officials or department employees to provide a follow-up report regarding actions taken in response to the recommendations made.
Certain investigative reports will not be posted or will be posted in a limited manner if the report contains privileged, confidential, or legally protected information.
Investigative Report (II-2305)
The OIG received a notification about the arrest of a COT employee assigned to Financial Services. The employee was criminally charged with possession of a controlled substance (synthetic cathinone).
Based on its investigative efforts, the OIG concluded:
- Employee was in possession of and illegally used synthetic cathinone, listed as a Schedule 1 drug under the Controlled Substances Act. (Allegation #1)
- Disposition: Substantiated
- Employee identified himself as a City employee to the TPD officer during a drug possession and grand theft/shoplifting investigation. (Allegation #2)
- Disposition: Substantiated
- Employee was in possession of a City laptop, cell phone, and payroll/tax documents which were not properly secured. (Allegation #3)
- Disposition: Substantiated
Investigative Report (II-2304)
In January 2023, the Office of Inspector General (OIG) received a request to review the access to and searches of City e-mail archives. Based on that request, the OIG conducted a preliminary review of the Smarsh system usage. The City uses the Smarsh system to archive and retrieve records of electronic communications such as e-mail, text messages, and social media posts. The preliminary review identified sufficient information to support the opening of an investigation into potential violations of a Smarsh user agreement.
Based on its investigative efforts, the OIG concluded:
- Incident #1: Employee did not violate the Smarsh user agreement based on the search for photographs.
- Incident #2: Employee did not violate the Smarsh user agreement based on the search for annual reports and evaluations of Appointed Officials.
- Incident #3: Employee did not violate the Smarsh user agreement based on the search for communications related to the Citizen Police Review Board.
The OIG identified areas for improvements to City policies and practices.
Investigative Report (II-2303)
The OIG received a notification about the arrest of a COT employee assigned to Underground Utilities and Public Infrastructure (UUPI). The information was received from the department and confirmed by TPD. The employee was criminally charged with grand theft, dealing in stolen property, and defrauding a secondhand dealer.
Based on its investigative efforts, the OIG concluded:
- Employee stole copper scrap from worksites and the facility's recycling dumpster. (Allegation #1)
- Disposition: Substantiated
- Employee provided a false claim of ownership of the scrap copper sold. (Allegation #2)
- Disposition: Unsubstantiated
- Employee sold the stolen copper and kept the proceeds from the sale for personal use. (Allegation #3)
- Disposition: Substantiated
Investigative Report (II-2302)
The OIG received a notification about the arrest of a COT employee assigned to the Energy Services Division of the Electric and Gas Utility. The information was received through an email from TPD. The employee was criminally charged with possession of a controlled substance.
Based on its investigative efforts, the OIG concluded:
- The employee conducted a transaction involving a controlled substance, illegally possessed a controlled substance, and committed illegal activities. (Allegation #1)
- Disposition: Substantiated
- The employee conducted a transaction involving an illegal controlled substance while in a City of Tallahassee uniform. (Allegation #2)
- Disposition: Substantiated
- The employee used a City of Tallahassee vehicle to facilitate the illegal purchase of a controlled substance. (Allegation #3)
- Disposition: Substantiated
The OIG was not notified of the incident by the offending employee's department as required by Ordinance. We recommended management promptly notify the OIG upon becoming aware of incidents that appear to fall within the jurisdiction of the Inspector General.
Investigative Report (II-2301)
In February 2021, the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) interviewed the complainant regarding six allegations against several City employees. Those employees were alleged to have conducted various acts of misconduct.
The complainant alleged that:
- A City employee lacked sensitivity, gave rude service while dealing with the complainant, and did not handle the complaint in a timely manner. (Allegation #1)
- Disposition: Unsubstantiated
- Abuse of process occurred when the complainant tried to conduct business with the City. (Allegation #2)
- Disposition: Unsubstantiated
- Two City employees conspired to ban the complainant from a City facility by issuing an illegal trespass warning. (Allegation #3)
- Disposition: Unsubstantiated
- A City employee refused to meet with the complainant. (Allegation #4)
- A City employee intentionally targeted the complainant's family member. (Allegation #5)
- Disposition: Unsubstantiated
- A City employee improperly rescinded an agreement related to a Title VI complaint. (Allegation #6)
- Disposition: Unsubstantiated
In response to Allegation #1, we recommended improvements be made to the process for notifying complainants as to the disposition of their complaints.
Investigative Report (II-2201)
In August of 2021 the Office of the Inspector General (OIG) received the referral of a complaint from the Independent Ethics Office regarding two StarMetro employees. Those employees were alleged to have conducted several acts of misconduct.
Based on its investigative efforts, the OIG concluded:
- Complainant alleged two StarMetro employees burglarized her home. (Allegation #1)
- Disposition: Employee #1, Exonerated; Employee #2, Unsubstantiated
- Complainant alleged Employee #1 committed Domestic Violence Battery against her and was arrested by TPD. (Allegation #2)
- Disposition: Substantiated
- Complainant alleged that the two StarMetro employees continually harassed her at her place of employment. (Allegation #3)
- Disposition: Employee #1, Unsubstantiated; Employee #2, Exonerated
- Complainant alleged that the two StarMetro employees used alcohol and marijuana while on and off duty. (Allegation #4)
- Disposition: Employee #1, Unsubstantiated; Employee #2, Unsubstantiated
As a result of our investigative efforts, we noted Employee #1 complied with City policy and notified the supervisor of the arrest. StarMetro also complied with City policy by notifying Human Resources of the arrest. However, as required by Ordinance, the OIG was not notified of the incident. Accordingly, we recommended management promptly notify the OIG upon becoming aware of incidents that appear to fall within the jurisdiction of the Inspector General.